Author Topic: 4106 vs. 4905  (Read 4815 times)

Offline OneLapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 853
    • www.markdavia.com
4106 vs. 4905
« on: April 24, 2015, 10:08:12 AM »
I know the 4106 inside and out, literally.  I know what to look out for on GM's in general, as well.

What are the pro's and con's of the 4905?  I know it's got an 8V71 vee drive, some were 35', some were 40', some were 4 spd Spicer, some were Allison.

I know I can get everything for the 4106 from Luke.  Are parts easy and cheap for the 4905?

Are the brakes and suspensions basically the same? 

Any feedback is really appreciated!
OneLapper
1964 PD4106-2853
www.markdavia.com

Offline Bill Gerrie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2015, 10:15:57 AM »
The 35' version that looks like a 4905 is a 4107. The 4905 is 40'. All parts are as easy to come by on either model. Some 4905's had a tag axle as well. 4 speed or auto on the 4905.

Offline luvrbus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19547
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2015, 10:28:43 AM »
Try and find the A or the H8H-649 they seem like a better bus to me
Life is short drink the good wine first

Offline OneLapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 853
    • www.markdavia.com
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2015, 12:06:55 PM »
Try and find the A or the H8H-649 they seem like a better bus to me

Hi Clifford!  Did you get my PM the other day?

Is the H8H-649 also a Vee drive setup?  I'm assuming it is, which is fine.
OneLapper
1964 PD4106-2853
www.markdavia.com

Offline OneLapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 853
    • www.markdavia.com
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2015, 12:13:12 PM »
The 35' version that looks like a 4905 is a 4107. The 4905 is 40'. All parts are as easy to come by on either model. Some 4905's had a tag axle as well. 4 speed or auto on the 4905.

Thanks for the info, Bill!  I'm jammed up all weekend but as soon as I find some time I'll do some research on the differences in models.   I definitely want a 40'er, and don't want a tag.  I will need the extra bay space.  It wont be loaded down with all the typical RV stuff, either.
OneLapper
1964 PD4106-2853
www.markdavia.com

Offline pabusnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
  • P8M4905A-333 former MK&O lines #731
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2015, 06:17:51 PM »
Mark,

I don't think too many of the 4905's had the tag(bogie) axle, but mine did.  After I replaced the entire floor inside, I removed the tag axle and built(probably overbuilt!) a bay floor in that short bay for my tanks(actually all my utilities).  I had the chance to insulate the whole area with 1.5 inches of foam, for if I ever go winter camping.

Steve Toomey
PAbusnut
Steve Toomey
PAbusnut

Offline OneLapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 853
    • www.markdavia.com
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2015, 04:41:08 PM »
I had the chance to talk with RJ at length about the differences between the 4107, 4905 and H8H-649.  Sounds like the 1978, 79, and 80 4905 and H8H-649 is what I'm looking for, with the factory Allison option, no tag. 

So.... anyone got one?  lol
OneLapper
1964 PD4106-2853
www.markdavia.com

Offline Geoff

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1483
    • Geoff & Sherry's RTS Conversion Pics
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2015, 05:19:31 PM »
Actually, the early '80s RTS is the cream of the crop for a well built GMC bus.  20,000+ made, and that is more than twice the 10,000 MC9s made.

--Geoff
'82 RTS
40' Suburban 102" wide
4:10 gears V730 auto
350 HP MUI 6V92TA
« Last Edit: April 26, 2015, 05:24:12 PM by Geoff »
Geoff
'82 RTS AZ

Offline RJ

  • Angola Coach Conversion "Aesop's Tortoise"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3572
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2015, 10:43:51 PM »
Geoff -

I totally agree with you about the RTS.

For what Mark is wanting to do, tho, he needs the large baggage bins of the 4905 series.

FWIW & HTH. . .

 ;)
RJ Long
PD4106-2784 No More
S13406 1978 MC-5C Converted 6V71/MT-644
S14947 1980 MC-5C Shell 6V92/HT-740
Cheney WA

Offline luvrbus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19547
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2015, 05:48:03 AM »
I am guessing you just want a GM but there are some nice MCI model C's and 102 A's for sell  out there with Cummins ,Cat or DD engines at good buys and the parts for a C and A's are a lot easier to find than for the GM,do you still want the air clutch parts for the 4106 ?
« Last Edit: April 27, 2015, 06:05:14 AM by luvrbus »
Life is short drink the good wine first

Offline OneLapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 853
    • www.markdavia.com
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #10 on: April 27, 2015, 11:16:39 AM »
I am guessing you just want a GM but there are some nice MCI model C's and 102 A's for sell  out there with Cummins ,Cat or DD engines at good buys and the parts for a C and A's are a lot easier to find than for the GM,do you still want the air clutch parts for the 4106 ?

I am looking for the GM parlor style bus.

Yes, I definitely still want the air assist parts!  I'm not getting rid of the 4106, that's still my family RV.  The 4905 is for a totally different project, but since it'll have a "vintage" spin to it, the classic GM parlor look is what I'm going for.
OneLapper
1964 PD4106-2853
www.markdavia.com

Offline luvrbus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19547
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #11 on: April 27, 2015, 11:40:20 AM »
Well heck I thought I had you one with a little history but he sold it for scrap it belonged to my brother in law in Idaho and was one of Shirley Muldowney GM's
Life is short drink the good wine first

Offline OneLapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 853
    • www.markdavia.com
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #12 on: April 27, 2015, 04:52:45 PM »
Well heck I thought I had you one with a little history but he sold it for scrap it belonged to my brother in law in Idaho and was one of Shirley Muldowney GM's

That would have been perfect!  Oh well.......
OneLapper
1964 PD4106-2853
www.markdavia.com

Offline Geoff

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1483
    • Geoff & Sherry's RTS Conversion Pics
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #13 on: April 27, 2015, 05:17:34 PM »
I've done quite well with two baggage bays 18"H by 5'W, 8 feet long, pass through, for the last 12 years.

--Geoff

Geoff -

I totally agree with you about the RTS.

For what Mark is wanting to do, tho, he needs the large baggage bins of the 4905 series.

FWIW & HTH. . .

 ;)
Geoff
'82 RTS AZ

Offline chessie4905

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2828
Re: 4106 vs. 4905
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2015, 05:34:29 AM »
 I know of a local H8H649 with standard trans. removed interior. Been sitting for some time . Could most likely get a good deal on it. In central Pa.
GMC h8h 649#028 (4905)
Pennsylvania-central