It is very hard to know all of the facts in this scenario because everyone providing the data has an agenda. But there are a few things that appear to be pretty clear:Our dependence on foreign oil has proven extremely painful, both geo-politically and financially.Because we cannot produce enough oil to be self-sustaining for any significant length of time, we must pursue alternative forms of energy as a long-term (15 + years) solution.We have available resources to alleviate (to some extent) the problem in the mid-term (5 - 10 years). There are unexplored/untapped reserves and companies willing to build new refineries.Short-term (1 - 5 years) solutions are much harder to define but would generally be limited to things that Congress would have control over (taxes, incentives, trade policy, etc.)In my opinion, someone has to put forward a comprehensive plan that includes the whole picture instead of trying to demagogue a particular point for a given constituency (which is what is happening now.)1. Long-term - Offer real incentives and investment for PROVEN solutions. Stop penalizing inventive people for developing solutions (fining people who use WVO because they didn't pay fuel tax, etc.) Stop dumping good money into solutions that are clearly not viable (like biodiesel, which the govt is subsidizing at an insane level just to get it close to affordable and, even though it barely touches the demand, is already causing food shortages.) How about something like the X-Prize to generate solutions - $10 million to the first person/group who can demonstrate a viable/affordable-to-the-everyday-joe alternative fuel/engine system for transportation?2. Mid-term - Go after every available natural resource. If you really think there are environmental risks, make the oil companies put up a bond to correct it if they cause a problem (like they do in other countries). Tell the environmentalists to put up or shut-up - put a viable alternative on the table (that private industry is willing to fund) or shut the he** up and get out of the way. Eliminate the NIMBY game. This is a national issue and everyone should be part of the solution. 3. Short-term - Congress needs to get their hands out of the cookie jar. Eliminate taxes from every layer of the fuel exploration, recovery, refining, distribution, etc. process. When the citizenry is paying through the nose, no congressperson should be able to stand there with a straight face and express their deep concern while they are looting the system. They can pay for it by not funding the Hog Farming Hall of Fame and other such nonsense. They always seem to be able to come up with the money for their pet projects, so I'm sure they can cover this loss of tax revenue.4. Short/mid-term - Get tough with the oil companies. If they aren't pumping and delivering into the market the maximum capacity available to them, we will sell their lease to someone else who will.5. Short/mid-term - Get tough with OPEC. Announce #2 and #4 above and, on top of it, tell all of our foreign sources that, starting next year, we will cap imported petroleum to no more than x% of their OUTPUT. This % will decrease by a set % every two years for (at least) the next 20 years. If they want to sell us more petroleum, they will have to put more petroleum into the global market, which will keep the price down.6. Short/mid-term - End speculation on petroleum. Anyone buying oil must take physical possession of the product and process (refine) it in some manner.7. Short/mid-term - Get tough on the auto manufacturers. Announce that, starting next year, we will allow the importation (without penalty) of any engine that exceeds by x% the average MPG of the best of the similarly sized engines produced here. If the best 3 - 4 liter engines in a given year average 27 mpg, any foreign-made engine that beats that number by x% can be imported.Just a couple thoughts from my addled brain...
this subject keeps coming up on a regular basis.the last two times caused me to make a few comments as to why oil prices are high.for some reason, my posts were eliminated.why are my ideas less important than the others?gary t'berryrts 102 40er